How to explain one side of Super Earth is smoother than the other side?












3












$begingroup$


Set in the near future a spaceship flew across an unclassified region of the Milky Way galaxy and found a Super Earth in an unnamed system, the planet is almost twice as massive as Earth and is orbiting fairly far away from it's parent star. Unfortunately there is no liquid water and is deemed too cold for settlement, strangely one side of the planet has a gigantic flat ice sheet covering half of the planet surface while the other side is ridded with craters some as deep as 20km below global mean surface gravity level. How to explain the finding?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Could it be as simple as all the continental crust has accumulated into a supercontinent on one side of the planet, while the other side is frozen ocean?
    $endgroup$
    – Arkenstein XII
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    How is this super Earth if the environment is so different from Earth's? It seems like it's too cold on the far side for life as we know it to be possible, and seemingly too inhospitable on the other. It seems like there's little air, and no plants to turn the air towards oxygen. Meanwhile, it's tide-locked while too far from the sun to get enough energy for life. Considering the millions of stars with untold planets in the galaxy, why come here?
    $endgroup$
    – Ed Grimm
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @EdGrimm: the definition of super earth is up to debate but I'm following the one used by kelper mission, the spacecraft is on a mission to chart the new region of space and to identify resource hot spot.
    $endgroup$
    – user6760
    4 hours ago
















3












$begingroup$


Set in the near future a spaceship flew across an unclassified region of the Milky Way galaxy and found a Super Earth in an unnamed system, the planet is almost twice as massive as Earth and is orbiting fairly far away from it's parent star. Unfortunately there is no liquid water and is deemed too cold for settlement, strangely one side of the planet has a gigantic flat ice sheet covering half of the planet surface while the other side is ridded with craters some as deep as 20km below global mean surface gravity level. How to explain the finding?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Could it be as simple as all the continental crust has accumulated into a supercontinent on one side of the planet, while the other side is frozen ocean?
    $endgroup$
    – Arkenstein XII
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    How is this super Earth if the environment is so different from Earth's? It seems like it's too cold on the far side for life as we know it to be possible, and seemingly too inhospitable on the other. It seems like there's little air, and no plants to turn the air towards oxygen. Meanwhile, it's tide-locked while too far from the sun to get enough energy for life. Considering the millions of stars with untold planets in the galaxy, why come here?
    $endgroup$
    – Ed Grimm
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @EdGrimm: the definition of super earth is up to debate but I'm following the one used by kelper mission, the spacecraft is on a mission to chart the new region of space and to identify resource hot spot.
    $endgroup$
    – user6760
    4 hours ago














3












3








3





$begingroup$


Set in the near future a spaceship flew across an unclassified region of the Milky Way galaxy and found a Super Earth in an unnamed system, the planet is almost twice as massive as Earth and is orbiting fairly far away from it's parent star. Unfortunately there is no liquid water and is deemed too cold for settlement, strangely one side of the planet has a gigantic flat ice sheet covering half of the planet surface while the other side is ridded with craters some as deep as 20km below global mean surface gravity level. How to explain the finding?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




Set in the near future a spaceship flew across an unclassified region of the Milky Way galaxy and found a Super Earth in an unnamed system, the planet is almost twice as massive as Earth and is orbiting fairly far away from it's parent star. Unfortunately there is no liquid water and is deemed too cold for settlement, strangely one side of the planet has a gigantic flat ice sheet covering half of the planet surface while the other side is ridded with craters some as deep as 20km below global mean surface gravity level. How to explain the finding?







planets geology topography






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 4 hours ago









user6760user6760

12k1366142




12k1366142












  • $begingroup$
    Could it be as simple as all the continental crust has accumulated into a supercontinent on one side of the planet, while the other side is frozen ocean?
    $endgroup$
    – Arkenstein XII
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    How is this super Earth if the environment is so different from Earth's? It seems like it's too cold on the far side for life as we know it to be possible, and seemingly too inhospitable on the other. It seems like there's little air, and no plants to turn the air towards oxygen. Meanwhile, it's tide-locked while too far from the sun to get enough energy for life. Considering the millions of stars with untold planets in the galaxy, why come here?
    $endgroup$
    – Ed Grimm
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @EdGrimm: the definition of super earth is up to debate but I'm following the one used by kelper mission, the spacecraft is on a mission to chart the new region of space and to identify resource hot spot.
    $endgroup$
    – user6760
    4 hours ago


















  • $begingroup$
    Could it be as simple as all the continental crust has accumulated into a supercontinent on one side of the planet, while the other side is frozen ocean?
    $endgroup$
    – Arkenstein XII
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    How is this super Earth if the environment is so different from Earth's? It seems like it's too cold on the far side for life as we know it to be possible, and seemingly too inhospitable on the other. It seems like there's little air, and no plants to turn the air towards oxygen. Meanwhile, it's tide-locked while too far from the sun to get enough energy for life. Considering the millions of stars with untold planets in the galaxy, why come here?
    $endgroup$
    – Ed Grimm
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @EdGrimm: the definition of super earth is up to debate but I'm following the one used by kelper mission, the spacecraft is on a mission to chart the new region of space and to identify resource hot spot.
    $endgroup$
    – user6760
    4 hours ago
















$begingroup$
Could it be as simple as all the continental crust has accumulated into a supercontinent on one side of the planet, while the other side is frozen ocean?
$endgroup$
– Arkenstein XII
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
Could it be as simple as all the continental crust has accumulated into a supercontinent on one side of the planet, while the other side is frozen ocean?
$endgroup$
– Arkenstein XII
4 hours ago












$begingroup$
How is this super Earth if the environment is so different from Earth's? It seems like it's too cold on the far side for life as we know it to be possible, and seemingly too inhospitable on the other. It seems like there's little air, and no plants to turn the air towards oxygen. Meanwhile, it's tide-locked while too far from the sun to get enough energy for life. Considering the millions of stars with untold planets in the galaxy, why come here?
$endgroup$
– Ed Grimm
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
How is this super Earth if the environment is so different from Earth's? It seems like it's too cold on the far side for life as we know it to be possible, and seemingly too inhospitable on the other. It seems like there's little air, and no plants to turn the air towards oxygen. Meanwhile, it's tide-locked while too far from the sun to get enough energy for life. Considering the millions of stars with untold planets in the galaxy, why come here?
$endgroup$
– Ed Grimm
4 hours ago












$begingroup$
@EdGrimm: the definition of super earth is up to debate but I'm following the one used by kelper mission, the spacecraft is on a mission to chart the new region of space and to identify resource hot spot.
$endgroup$
– user6760
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
@EdGrimm: the definition of super earth is up to debate but I'm following the one used by kelper mission, the spacecraft is on a mission to chart the new region of space and to identify resource hot spot.
$endgroup$
– user6760
4 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

I'm reminded strongly of Iapetus, a moon of Saturn that has a dramatic two-tone coloring. One hemisphere is quite light, while the other is dark. It almost looks like you dunked half of the moon in chocolate:



Map of Iapetus
Image credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/Space Science Institute/Lunar and Planetary Institute. Public domain.



Iapetus is tidally locked, meaning that one side is always the "leading" half of the moon. This means that it easily attracts particles from a giant ring of dust created by the moon Phoebe, which orbits in the opposite direction. One half of Iapetus is bombarded by the darker particles, which, a long time ago, kick-started a feedback loop that sublimated ice on one side while keeping it frozen on the other. This self-propagating cycle continued until one hemisphere was dark and one was light.



I can imagine something similar happening here - tidal locking in the past, and a transfer of material from another planet orbiting close by in a retrograde orbit. It's possible that this transfer could have been a true bombardment, rather than the light dusting Iapetus received.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I like real world example👍
    $endgroup$
    – user6760
    4 hours ago



















1












$begingroup$

Big impact.



Something like this might have happened to Mars.



https://www.space.com/5558-huge-impact-created-mars-split-personality.html



mars impact




Scientists have been scratching their heads trying to explain the differences between the two sides of Mars for about 30 years. The northern hemisphere of the planet is smooth and low, and some experts think it may have contained a vast ocean long ago. Meanwhile, the southern half of the Martian surface is rough and heavily-cratered, and about 2.5 miles to 5 miles (4 km to 8 km) higher in elevation than the northern basin...



"What we noticed is that the dichotomy boundary around the planet was actually smooth and regular. We tested to see if we could fit this with any shape, and it just so happens that it's almost perfectly fitted by an ellipse. There's only one process that's known to make an elliptical depression like that, and that's a giant impact."




So too your planet. Something big whacked into it hard, flattening out the water side. An impact like that probably softened everything up, and when it equilibrated the new giant hole filled with water, that then froze.



Whatever the big impactor was, it had friends which accounted for the holes on the far side. Or maybe material knocked free from the impact flew out and then eventually back in, digging those craters on the dry side.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$





















    0












    $begingroup$

    Just a shot in the dark, but the planet could be tidally locked, similar to our moon, meaning that one side always faces away from the sun. It could be that the side facing away from the sun would have cooled so much as to create a frozen surface of water, while all water from the other side boiled away. The craters on the inner side are caused by meteors, and they show only because there is no frozen ocean covering them, only bare crust.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Joe Fioti is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "579"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f139413%2fhow-to-explain-one-side-of-super-earth-is-smoother-than-the-other-side%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      4












      $begingroup$

      I'm reminded strongly of Iapetus, a moon of Saturn that has a dramatic two-tone coloring. One hemisphere is quite light, while the other is dark. It almost looks like you dunked half of the moon in chocolate:



      Map of Iapetus
      Image credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/Space Science Institute/Lunar and Planetary Institute. Public domain.



      Iapetus is tidally locked, meaning that one side is always the "leading" half of the moon. This means that it easily attracts particles from a giant ring of dust created by the moon Phoebe, which orbits in the opposite direction. One half of Iapetus is bombarded by the darker particles, which, a long time ago, kick-started a feedback loop that sublimated ice on one side while keeping it frozen on the other. This self-propagating cycle continued until one hemisphere was dark and one was light.



      I can imagine something similar happening here - tidal locking in the past, and a transfer of material from another planet orbiting close by in a retrograde orbit. It's possible that this transfer could have been a true bombardment, rather than the light dusting Iapetus received.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$













      • $begingroup$
        I like real world example👍
        $endgroup$
        – user6760
        4 hours ago
















      4












      $begingroup$

      I'm reminded strongly of Iapetus, a moon of Saturn that has a dramatic two-tone coloring. One hemisphere is quite light, while the other is dark. It almost looks like you dunked half of the moon in chocolate:



      Map of Iapetus
      Image credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/Space Science Institute/Lunar and Planetary Institute. Public domain.



      Iapetus is tidally locked, meaning that one side is always the "leading" half of the moon. This means that it easily attracts particles from a giant ring of dust created by the moon Phoebe, which orbits in the opposite direction. One half of Iapetus is bombarded by the darker particles, which, a long time ago, kick-started a feedback loop that sublimated ice on one side while keeping it frozen on the other. This self-propagating cycle continued until one hemisphere was dark and one was light.



      I can imagine something similar happening here - tidal locking in the past, and a transfer of material from another planet orbiting close by in a retrograde orbit. It's possible that this transfer could have been a true bombardment, rather than the light dusting Iapetus received.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$













      • $begingroup$
        I like real world example👍
        $endgroup$
        – user6760
        4 hours ago














      4












      4








      4





      $begingroup$

      I'm reminded strongly of Iapetus, a moon of Saturn that has a dramatic two-tone coloring. One hemisphere is quite light, while the other is dark. It almost looks like you dunked half of the moon in chocolate:



      Map of Iapetus
      Image credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/Space Science Institute/Lunar and Planetary Institute. Public domain.



      Iapetus is tidally locked, meaning that one side is always the "leading" half of the moon. This means that it easily attracts particles from a giant ring of dust created by the moon Phoebe, which orbits in the opposite direction. One half of Iapetus is bombarded by the darker particles, which, a long time ago, kick-started a feedback loop that sublimated ice on one side while keeping it frozen on the other. This self-propagating cycle continued until one hemisphere was dark and one was light.



      I can imagine something similar happening here - tidal locking in the past, and a transfer of material from another planet orbiting close by in a retrograde orbit. It's possible that this transfer could have been a true bombardment, rather than the light dusting Iapetus received.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$



      I'm reminded strongly of Iapetus, a moon of Saturn that has a dramatic two-tone coloring. One hemisphere is quite light, while the other is dark. It almost looks like you dunked half of the moon in chocolate:



      Map of Iapetus
      Image credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/Space Science Institute/Lunar and Planetary Institute. Public domain.



      Iapetus is tidally locked, meaning that one side is always the "leading" half of the moon. This means that it easily attracts particles from a giant ring of dust created by the moon Phoebe, which orbits in the opposite direction. One half of Iapetus is bombarded by the darker particles, which, a long time ago, kick-started a feedback loop that sublimated ice on one side while keeping it frozen on the other. This self-propagating cycle continued until one hemisphere was dark and one was light.



      I can imagine something similar happening here - tidal locking in the past, and a transfer of material from another planet orbiting close by in a retrograde orbit. It's possible that this transfer could have been a true bombardment, rather than the light dusting Iapetus received.







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered 4 hours ago









      HDE 226868HDE 226868

      64.8k13223420




      64.8k13223420












      • $begingroup$
        I like real world example👍
        $endgroup$
        – user6760
        4 hours ago


















      • $begingroup$
        I like real world example👍
        $endgroup$
        – user6760
        4 hours ago
















      $begingroup$
      I like real world example👍
      $endgroup$
      – user6760
      4 hours ago




      $begingroup$
      I like real world example👍
      $endgroup$
      – user6760
      4 hours ago











      1












      $begingroup$

      Big impact.



      Something like this might have happened to Mars.



      https://www.space.com/5558-huge-impact-created-mars-split-personality.html



      mars impact




      Scientists have been scratching their heads trying to explain the differences between the two sides of Mars for about 30 years. The northern hemisphere of the planet is smooth and low, and some experts think it may have contained a vast ocean long ago. Meanwhile, the southern half of the Martian surface is rough and heavily-cratered, and about 2.5 miles to 5 miles (4 km to 8 km) higher in elevation than the northern basin...



      "What we noticed is that the dichotomy boundary around the planet was actually smooth and regular. We tested to see if we could fit this with any shape, and it just so happens that it's almost perfectly fitted by an ellipse. There's only one process that's known to make an elliptical depression like that, and that's a giant impact."




      So too your planet. Something big whacked into it hard, flattening out the water side. An impact like that probably softened everything up, and when it equilibrated the new giant hole filled with water, that then froze.



      Whatever the big impactor was, it had friends which accounted for the holes on the far side. Or maybe material knocked free from the impact flew out and then eventually back in, digging those craters on the dry side.






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$


















        1












        $begingroup$

        Big impact.



        Something like this might have happened to Mars.



        https://www.space.com/5558-huge-impact-created-mars-split-personality.html



        mars impact




        Scientists have been scratching their heads trying to explain the differences between the two sides of Mars for about 30 years. The northern hemisphere of the planet is smooth and low, and some experts think it may have contained a vast ocean long ago. Meanwhile, the southern half of the Martian surface is rough and heavily-cratered, and about 2.5 miles to 5 miles (4 km to 8 km) higher in elevation than the northern basin...



        "What we noticed is that the dichotomy boundary around the planet was actually smooth and regular. We tested to see if we could fit this with any shape, and it just so happens that it's almost perfectly fitted by an ellipse. There's only one process that's known to make an elliptical depression like that, and that's a giant impact."




        So too your planet. Something big whacked into it hard, flattening out the water side. An impact like that probably softened everything up, and when it equilibrated the new giant hole filled with water, that then froze.



        Whatever the big impactor was, it had friends which accounted for the holes on the far side. Or maybe material knocked free from the impact flew out and then eventually back in, digging those craters on the dry side.






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$
















          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          Big impact.



          Something like this might have happened to Mars.



          https://www.space.com/5558-huge-impact-created-mars-split-personality.html



          mars impact




          Scientists have been scratching their heads trying to explain the differences between the two sides of Mars for about 30 years. The northern hemisphere of the planet is smooth and low, and some experts think it may have contained a vast ocean long ago. Meanwhile, the southern half of the Martian surface is rough and heavily-cratered, and about 2.5 miles to 5 miles (4 km to 8 km) higher in elevation than the northern basin...



          "What we noticed is that the dichotomy boundary around the planet was actually smooth and regular. We tested to see if we could fit this with any shape, and it just so happens that it's almost perfectly fitted by an ellipse. There's only one process that's known to make an elliptical depression like that, and that's a giant impact."




          So too your planet. Something big whacked into it hard, flattening out the water side. An impact like that probably softened everything up, and when it equilibrated the new giant hole filled with water, that then froze.



          Whatever the big impactor was, it had friends which accounted for the holes on the far side. Or maybe material knocked free from the impact flew out and then eventually back in, digging those craters on the dry side.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          Big impact.



          Something like this might have happened to Mars.



          https://www.space.com/5558-huge-impact-created-mars-split-personality.html



          mars impact




          Scientists have been scratching their heads trying to explain the differences between the two sides of Mars for about 30 years. The northern hemisphere of the planet is smooth and low, and some experts think it may have contained a vast ocean long ago. Meanwhile, the southern half of the Martian surface is rough and heavily-cratered, and about 2.5 miles to 5 miles (4 km to 8 km) higher in elevation than the northern basin...



          "What we noticed is that the dichotomy boundary around the planet was actually smooth and regular. We tested to see if we could fit this with any shape, and it just so happens that it's almost perfectly fitted by an ellipse. There's only one process that's known to make an elliptical depression like that, and that's a giant impact."




          So too your planet. Something big whacked into it hard, flattening out the water side. An impact like that probably softened everything up, and when it equilibrated the new giant hole filled with water, that then froze.



          Whatever the big impactor was, it had friends which accounted for the holes on the far side. Or maybe material knocked free from the impact flew out and then eventually back in, digging those craters on the dry side.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 8 mins ago









          G0BLiN

          2,91511121




          2,91511121










          answered 3 hours ago









          WillkWillk

          108k26204452




          108k26204452























              0












              $begingroup$

              Just a shot in the dark, but the planet could be tidally locked, similar to our moon, meaning that one side always faces away from the sun. It could be that the side facing away from the sun would have cooled so much as to create a frozen surface of water, while all water from the other side boiled away. The craters on the inner side are caused by meteors, and they show only because there is no frozen ocean covering them, only bare crust.






              share|improve this answer








              New contributor




              Joe Fioti is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.






              $endgroup$


















                0












                $begingroup$

                Just a shot in the dark, but the planet could be tidally locked, similar to our moon, meaning that one side always faces away from the sun. It could be that the side facing away from the sun would have cooled so much as to create a frozen surface of water, while all water from the other side boiled away. The craters on the inner side are caused by meteors, and they show only because there is no frozen ocean covering them, only bare crust.






                share|improve this answer








                New contributor




                Joe Fioti is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.






                $endgroup$
















                  0












                  0








                  0





                  $begingroup$

                  Just a shot in the dark, but the planet could be tidally locked, similar to our moon, meaning that one side always faces away from the sun. It could be that the side facing away from the sun would have cooled so much as to create a frozen surface of water, while all water from the other side boiled away. The craters on the inner side are caused by meteors, and they show only because there is no frozen ocean covering them, only bare crust.






                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  Joe Fioti is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






                  $endgroup$



                  Just a shot in the dark, but the planet could be tidally locked, similar to our moon, meaning that one side always faces away from the sun. It could be that the side facing away from the sun would have cooled so much as to create a frozen surface of water, while all water from the other side boiled away. The craters on the inner side are caused by meteors, and they show only because there is no frozen ocean covering them, only bare crust.







                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  Joe Fioti is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer






                  New contributor




                  Joe Fioti is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  answered 4 hours ago









                  Joe FiotiJoe Fioti

                  1




                  1




                  New contributor




                  Joe Fioti is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.





                  New contributor





                  Joe Fioti is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






                  Joe Fioti is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f139413%2fhow-to-explain-one-side-of-super-earth-is-smoother-than-the-other-side%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Михайлов, Христо

                      Гороховецкий артиллерийский полигон

                      Центральная группа войск