How long will my money last at roulette?
$begingroup$
I'm at the casino, standing next to a roulette table with a $10 minimum bet. I want to stay here as long as possible, so I'm going to repeatedly make the minimum bet until I run out of money.
I'm playing European roulette, and I'm putting my money on 28 every time. This means that with every spin, I have a 1 in 37 chance of winning $350, and a 36 in 37 chance of losing $10.
I only have $20 in my pocket, so I'm almost certainly not going to be here for very long! (This is distinctly not awesome.) But, on the other hand, there is a small chance that I'll get 35 extra spins, so that's got to count for a little bit.
So, how long, on average, is my money going to last me? Three spins? Four?
mathematics probability game
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm at the casino, standing next to a roulette table with a $10 minimum bet. I want to stay here as long as possible, so I'm going to repeatedly make the minimum bet until I run out of money.
I'm playing European roulette, and I'm putting my money on 28 every time. This means that with every spin, I have a 1 in 37 chance of winning $350, and a 36 in 37 chance of losing $10.
I only have $20 in my pocket, so I'm almost certainly not going to be here for very long! (This is distinctly not awesome.) But, on the other hand, there is a small chance that I'll get 35 extra spins, so that's got to count for a little bit.
So, how long, on average, is my money going to last me? Three spins? Four?
mathematics probability game
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
This seems a math problem not a puzzling problem
$endgroup$
– Yout Ried
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@YoutRied Perhaps. Looking at the test points at this meta answer, I think that this question has a "clever or elegant solution" and an "unexpected or counterintuitive result". I'm not sure if this can be said to have an "unexpected problem statement".
$endgroup$
– Tanner Swett
5 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm at the casino, standing next to a roulette table with a $10 minimum bet. I want to stay here as long as possible, so I'm going to repeatedly make the minimum bet until I run out of money.
I'm playing European roulette, and I'm putting my money on 28 every time. This means that with every spin, I have a 1 in 37 chance of winning $350, and a 36 in 37 chance of losing $10.
I only have $20 in my pocket, so I'm almost certainly not going to be here for very long! (This is distinctly not awesome.) But, on the other hand, there is a small chance that I'll get 35 extra spins, so that's got to count for a little bit.
So, how long, on average, is my money going to last me? Three spins? Four?
mathematics probability game
$endgroup$
I'm at the casino, standing next to a roulette table with a $10 minimum bet. I want to stay here as long as possible, so I'm going to repeatedly make the minimum bet until I run out of money.
I'm playing European roulette, and I'm putting my money on 28 every time. This means that with every spin, I have a 1 in 37 chance of winning $350, and a 36 in 37 chance of losing $10.
I only have $20 in my pocket, so I'm almost certainly not going to be here for very long! (This is distinctly not awesome.) But, on the other hand, there is a small chance that I'll get 35 extra spins, so that's got to count for a little bit.
So, how long, on average, is my money going to last me? Three spins? Four?
mathematics probability game
mathematics probability game
asked 6 hours ago
Tanner SwettTanner Swett
610411
610411
2
$begingroup$
This seems a math problem not a puzzling problem
$endgroup$
– Yout Ried
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@YoutRied Perhaps. Looking at the test points at this meta answer, I think that this question has a "clever or elegant solution" and an "unexpected or counterintuitive result". I'm not sure if this can be said to have an "unexpected problem statement".
$endgroup$
– Tanner Swett
5 hours ago
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
This seems a math problem not a puzzling problem
$endgroup$
– Yout Ried
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@YoutRied Perhaps. Looking at the test points at this meta answer, I think that this question has a "clever or elegant solution" and an "unexpected or counterintuitive result". I'm not sure if this can be said to have an "unexpected problem statement".
$endgroup$
– Tanner Swett
5 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
This seems a math problem not a puzzling problem
$endgroup$
– Yout Ried
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
This seems a math problem not a puzzling problem
$endgroup$
– Yout Ried
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@YoutRied Perhaps. Looking at the test points at this meta answer, I think that this question has a "clever or elegant solution" and an "unexpected or counterintuitive result". I'm not sure if this can be said to have an "unexpected problem statement".
$endgroup$
– Tanner Swett
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@YoutRied Perhaps. Looking at the test points at this meta answer, I think that this question has a "clever or elegant solution" and an "unexpected or counterintuitive result". I'm not sure if this can be said to have an "unexpected problem statement".
$endgroup$
– Tanner Swett
5 hours ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Suppose $t(n)$ is the average number of spins you get if you start with $$10n$. We want $t(2)$. If you start with $n$ ten-dollar bills, put $n-1$ in your pocket and play until you are broke, then take the next $10 out and play until you are broke, and so on: this is exactly equivalent to just starting with $$10n$ and playing until you're broke, so $t(n)=kn$ for some $k$. On the other hand, obviously $t(0)=0$ and for $n>0$ we have $t(n)=1+frac{36}{37}t(n-1)+frac{1}{37}t(n+35)$. Substituting $t(n)=kn$ into the latter equation and solving for $k$ we find
$k=37$ -- i.e., the number of spins you get, on average, is 37 times your initial multiple of the minimum stake. So if you arrive with $$20$ and the minimum stake is $$10$ then on average you get to spin the wheel 74 times.
[EDITED to add:] JonMark Perry's answer suggests another way to proceed after establishing that $t(n)=kn$: once you have that you can
go from "you lose $$frac{10}{37}$ per spin on average" to "it takes 37 spins to lose $$10$ on average". But, for me at least, this takes a little more thought to see it's valid than the more straightforward calculation above.
[Meta: to me this seems just "fun" enough to be a puzzle rather than a mere mathematics problem, but I won't be upset if others disagree and this gets closed for being too mathematics-textbook-problem-y.]
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Certainly an unexpected or unintuitive solution. I would have expected the answer to be much less.
$endgroup$
– GentlePurpleRain♦
4 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Imagine you start with $$370$. You play for $37$ turns and come back with $$360$. You borrow $$10$, and go again for another $37$ turns, and again come back with $$360$, and borrow another $$10$.
You repeat for a total of $37$ big turns, and now you have borrowed as much as you came with, and the bank won't lend you any more money.
So, you survive $37$ big turns with $$370$. $37$ big turns is $1369$ turns, but we only want $frac2{37}$ of this, which is:
74 turns.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
"Imagine you start with $370. You play for 37 turns and come back with $350." If you play 37 spins, the "expectation" is that you lose $10 36 times and win $350 once, making a net loss of $10, so you'll have $360.
$endgroup$
– Tanner Swett
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@TannerSwett; I forgot you get your stake back!
$endgroup$
– JonMark Perry
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
It looks to me as if you're assuming that "it takes an average of N turns to lose $10" and "on average you lose $10/N per turn" are equivalent -- the first is what's obvious and the second is what you're using -- but that seems like a thing that needs proving. Or am I missing the point somehow?
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan♦
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@GarethMcCaughan; 2->1 is obvious, and 1->2 is because of the uniformity of roulette
$endgroup$
– JonMark Perry
3 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Incidentally, if this argument works then it seems to me you don't need the business about "big turns" at all: you lose an average of 1/37 of a unit per spin, "therefore" on average it takes 37 sounds to lose each unit.
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan♦
2 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Let's say that the value in spins of each $10 is x.
x is equal to 1 (the spin you get for the initial money) plus 35x/37 (350 bucks, 1/37 of the time). From there, it's simple math. Subtract 35x/37 from both sides. 2x/37=1, so 2x=37
thus
on average, your $20 (2x) will net you 37 spins.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "559"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f79851%2fhow-long-will-my-money-last-at-roulette%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Suppose $t(n)$ is the average number of spins you get if you start with $$10n$. We want $t(2)$. If you start with $n$ ten-dollar bills, put $n-1$ in your pocket and play until you are broke, then take the next $10 out and play until you are broke, and so on: this is exactly equivalent to just starting with $$10n$ and playing until you're broke, so $t(n)=kn$ for some $k$. On the other hand, obviously $t(0)=0$ and for $n>0$ we have $t(n)=1+frac{36}{37}t(n-1)+frac{1}{37}t(n+35)$. Substituting $t(n)=kn$ into the latter equation and solving for $k$ we find
$k=37$ -- i.e., the number of spins you get, on average, is 37 times your initial multiple of the minimum stake. So if you arrive with $$20$ and the minimum stake is $$10$ then on average you get to spin the wheel 74 times.
[EDITED to add:] JonMark Perry's answer suggests another way to proceed after establishing that $t(n)=kn$: once you have that you can
go from "you lose $$frac{10}{37}$ per spin on average" to "it takes 37 spins to lose $$10$ on average". But, for me at least, this takes a little more thought to see it's valid than the more straightforward calculation above.
[Meta: to me this seems just "fun" enough to be a puzzle rather than a mere mathematics problem, but I won't be upset if others disagree and this gets closed for being too mathematics-textbook-problem-y.]
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Certainly an unexpected or unintuitive solution. I would have expected the answer to be much less.
$endgroup$
– GentlePurpleRain♦
4 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose $t(n)$ is the average number of spins you get if you start with $$10n$. We want $t(2)$. If you start with $n$ ten-dollar bills, put $n-1$ in your pocket and play until you are broke, then take the next $10 out and play until you are broke, and so on: this is exactly equivalent to just starting with $$10n$ and playing until you're broke, so $t(n)=kn$ for some $k$. On the other hand, obviously $t(0)=0$ and for $n>0$ we have $t(n)=1+frac{36}{37}t(n-1)+frac{1}{37}t(n+35)$. Substituting $t(n)=kn$ into the latter equation and solving for $k$ we find
$k=37$ -- i.e., the number of spins you get, on average, is 37 times your initial multiple of the minimum stake. So if you arrive with $$20$ and the minimum stake is $$10$ then on average you get to spin the wheel 74 times.
[EDITED to add:] JonMark Perry's answer suggests another way to proceed after establishing that $t(n)=kn$: once you have that you can
go from "you lose $$frac{10}{37}$ per spin on average" to "it takes 37 spins to lose $$10$ on average". But, for me at least, this takes a little more thought to see it's valid than the more straightforward calculation above.
[Meta: to me this seems just "fun" enough to be a puzzle rather than a mere mathematics problem, but I won't be upset if others disagree and this gets closed for being too mathematics-textbook-problem-y.]
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Certainly an unexpected or unintuitive solution. I would have expected the answer to be much less.
$endgroup$
– GentlePurpleRain♦
4 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose $t(n)$ is the average number of spins you get if you start with $$10n$. We want $t(2)$. If you start with $n$ ten-dollar bills, put $n-1$ in your pocket and play until you are broke, then take the next $10 out and play until you are broke, and so on: this is exactly equivalent to just starting with $$10n$ and playing until you're broke, so $t(n)=kn$ for some $k$. On the other hand, obviously $t(0)=0$ and for $n>0$ we have $t(n)=1+frac{36}{37}t(n-1)+frac{1}{37}t(n+35)$. Substituting $t(n)=kn$ into the latter equation and solving for $k$ we find
$k=37$ -- i.e., the number of spins you get, on average, is 37 times your initial multiple of the minimum stake. So if you arrive with $$20$ and the minimum stake is $$10$ then on average you get to spin the wheel 74 times.
[EDITED to add:] JonMark Perry's answer suggests another way to proceed after establishing that $t(n)=kn$: once you have that you can
go from "you lose $$frac{10}{37}$ per spin on average" to "it takes 37 spins to lose $$10$ on average". But, for me at least, this takes a little more thought to see it's valid than the more straightforward calculation above.
[Meta: to me this seems just "fun" enough to be a puzzle rather than a mere mathematics problem, but I won't be upset if others disagree and this gets closed for being too mathematics-textbook-problem-y.]
$endgroup$
Suppose $t(n)$ is the average number of spins you get if you start with $$10n$. We want $t(2)$. If you start with $n$ ten-dollar bills, put $n-1$ in your pocket and play until you are broke, then take the next $10 out and play until you are broke, and so on: this is exactly equivalent to just starting with $$10n$ and playing until you're broke, so $t(n)=kn$ for some $k$. On the other hand, obviously $t(0)=0$ and for $n>0$ we have $t(n)=1+frac{36}{37}t(n-1)+frac{1}{37}t(n+35)$. Substituting $t(n)=kn$ into the latter equation and solving for $k$ we find
$k=37$ -- i.e., the number of spins you get, on average, is 37 times your initial multiple of the minimum stake. So if you arrive with $$20$ and the minimum stake is $$10$ then on average you get to spin the wheel 74 times.
[EDITED to add:] JonMark Perry's answer suggests another way to proceed after establishing that $t(n)=kn$: once you have that you can
go from "you lose $$frac{10}{37}$ per spin on average" to "it takes 37 spins to lose $$10$ on average". But, for me at least, this takes a little more thought to see it's valid than the more straightforward calculation above.
[Meta: to me this seems just "fun" enough to be a puzzle rather than a mere mathematics problem, but I won't be upset if others disagree and this gets closed for being too mathematics-textbook-problem-y.]
edited 2 hours ago
answered 5 hours ago
Gareth McCaughan♦Gareth McCaughan
63k3162246
63k3162246
$begingroup$
Certainly an unexpected or unintuitive solution. I would have expected the answer to be much less.
$endgroup$
– GentlePurpleRain♦
4 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Certainly an unexpected or unintuitive solution. I would have expected the answer to be much less.
$endgroup$
– GentlePurpleRain♦
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Certainly an unexpected or unintuitive solution. I would have expected the answer to be much less.
$endgroup$
– GentlePurpleRain♦
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Certainly an unexpected or unintuitive solution. I would have expected the answer to be much less.
$endgroup$
– GentlePurpleRain♦
4 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Imagine you start with $$370$. You play for $37$ turns and come back with $$360$. You borrow $$10$, and go again for another $37$ turns, and again come back with $$360$, and borrow another $$10$.
You repeat for a total of $37$ big turns, and now you have borrowed as much as you came with, and the bank won't lend you any more money.
So, you survive $37$ big turns with $$370$. $37$ big turns is $1369$ turns, but we only want $frac2{37}$ of this, which is:
74 turns.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
"Imagine you start with $370. You play for 37 turns and come back with $350." If you play 37 spins, the "expectation" is that you lose $10 36 times and win $350 once, making a net loss of $10, so you'll have $360.
$endgroup$
– Tanner Swett
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@TannerSwett; I forgot you get your stake back!
$endgroup$
– JonMark Perry
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
It looks to me as if you're assuming that "it takes an average of N turns to lose $10" and "on average you lose $10/N per turn" are equivalent -- the first is what's obvious and the second is what you're using -- but that seems like a thing that needs proving. Or am I missing the point somehow?
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan♦
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@GarethMcCaughan; 2->1 is obvious, and 1->2 is because of the uniformity of roulette
$endgroup$
– JonMark Perry
3 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Incidentally, if this argument works then it seems to me you don't need the business about "big turns" at all: you lose an average of 1/37 of a unit per spin, "therefore" on average it takes 37 sounds to lose each unit.
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan♦
2 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Imagine you start with $$370$. You play for $37$ turns and come back with $$360$. You borrow $$10$, and go again for another $37$ turns, and again come back with $$360$, and borrow another $$10$.
You repeat for a total of $37$ big turns, and now you have borrowed as much as you came with, and the bank won't lend you any more money.
So, you survive $37$ big turns with $$370$. $37$ big turns is $1369$ turns, but we only want $frac2{37}$ of this, which is:
74 turns.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
"Imagine you start with $370. You play for 37 turns and come back with $350." If you play 37 spins, the "expectation" is that you lose $10 36 times and win $350 once, making a net loss of $10, so you'll have $360.
$endgroup$
– Tanner Swett
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@TannerSwett; I forgot you get your stake back!
$endgroup$
– JonMark Perry
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
It looks to me as if you're assuming that "it takes an average of N turns to lose $10" and "on average you lose $10/N per turn" are equivalent -- the first is what's obvious and the second is what you're using -- but that seems like a thing that needs proving. Or am I missing the point somehow?
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan♦
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@GarethMcCaughan; 2->1 is obvious, and 1->2 is because of the uniformity of roulette
$endgroup$
– JonMark Perry
3 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Incidentally, if this argument works then it seems to me you don't need the business about "big turns" at all: you lose an average of 1/37 of a unit per spin, "therefore" on average it takes 37 sounds to lose each unit.
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan♦
2 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Imagine you start with $$370$. You play for $37$ turns and come back with $$360$. You borrow $$10$, and go again for another $37$ turns, and again come back with $$360$, and borrow another $$10$.
You repeat for a total of $37$ big turns, and now you have borrowed as much as you came with, and the bank won't lend you any more money.
So, you survive $37$ big turns with $$370$. $37$ big turns is $1369$ turns, but we only want $frac2{37}$ of this, which is:
74 turns.
$endgroup$
Imagine you start with $$370$. You play for $37$ turns and come back with $$360$. You borrow $$10$, and go again for another $37$ turns, and again come back with $$360$, and borrow another $$10$.
You repeat for a total of $37$ big turns, and now you have borrowed as much as you came with, and the bank won't lend you any more money.
So, you survive $37$ big turns with $$370$. $37$ big turns is $1369$ turns, but we only want $frac2{37}$ of this, which is:
74 turns.
edited 3 hours ago
answered 3 hours ago
JonMark PerryJonMark Perry
19.2k63991
19.2k63991
$begingroup$
"Imagine you start with $370. You play for 37 turns and come back with $350." If you play 37 spins, the "expectation" is that you lose $10 36 times and win $350 once, making a net loss of $10, so you'll have $360.
$endgroup$
– Tanner Swett
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@TannerSwett; I forgot you get your stake back!
$endgroup$
– JonMark Perry
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
It looks to me as if you're assuming that "it takes an average of N turns to lose $10" and "on average you lose $10/N per turn" are equivalent -- the first is what's obvious and the second is what you're using -- but that seems like a thing that needs proving. Or am I missing the point somehow?
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan♦
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@GarethMcCaughan; 2->1 is obvious, and 1->2 is because of the uniformity of roulette
$endgroup$
– JonMark Perry
3 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Incidentally, if this argument works then it seems to me you don't need the business about "big turns" at all: you lose an average of 1/37 of a unit per spin, "therefore" on average it takes 37 sounds to lose each unit.
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan♦
2 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
"Imagine you start with $370. You play for 37 turns and come back with $350." If you play 37 spins, the "expectation" is that you lose $10 36 times and win $350 once, making a net loss of $10, so you'll have $360.
$endgroup$
– Tanner Swett
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@TannerSwett; I forgot you get your stake back!
$endgroup$
– JonMark Perry
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
It looks to me as if you're assuming that "it takes an average of N turns to lose $10" and "on average you lose $10/N per turn" are equivalent -- the first is what's obvious and the second is what you're using -- but that seems like a thing that needs proving. Or am I missing the point somehow?
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan♦
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@GarethMcCaughan; 2->1 is obvious, and 1->2 is because of the uniformity of roulette
$endgroup$
– JonMark Perry
3 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Incidentally, if this argument works then it seems to me you don't need the business about "big turns" at all: you lose an average of 1/37 of a unit per spin, "therefore" on average it takes 37 sounds to lose each unit.
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan♦
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
"Imagine you start with $370. You play for 37 turns and come back with $350." If you play 37 spins, the "expectation" is that you lose $10 36 times and win $350 once, making a net loss of $10, so you'll have $360.
$endgroup$
– Tanner Swett
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
"Imagine you start with $370. You play for 37 turns and come back with $350." If you play 37 spins, the "expectation" is that you lose $10 36 times and win $350 once, making a net loss of $10, so you'll have $360.
$endgroup$
– Tanner Swett
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@TannerSwett; I forgot you get your stake back!
$endgroup$
– JonMark Perry
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@TannerSwett; I forgot you get your stake back!
$endgroup$
– JonMark Perry
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
It looks to me as if you're assuming that "it takes an average of N turns to lose $10" and "on average you lose $10/N per turn" are equivalent -- the first is what's obvious and the second is what you're using -- but that seems like a thing that needs proving. Or am I missing the point somehow?
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan♦
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
It looks to me as if you're assuming that "it takes an average of N turns to lose $10" and "on average you lose $10/N per turn" are equivalent -- the first is what's obvious and the second is what you're using -- but that seems like a thing that needs proving. Or am I missing the point somehow?
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan♦
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@GarethMcCaughan; 2->1 is obvious, and 1->2 is because of the uniformity of roulette
$endgroup$
– JonMark Perry
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@GarethMcCaughan; 2->1 is obvious, and 1->2 is because of the uniformity of roulette
$endgroup$
– JonMark Perry
3 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Incidentally, if this argument works then it seems to me you don't need the business about "big turns" at all: you lose an average of 1/37 of a unit per spin, "therefore" on average it takes 37 sounds to lose each unit.
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan♦
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Incidentally, if this argument works then it seems to me you don't need the business about "big turns" at all: you lose an average of 1/37 of a unit per spin, "therefore" on average it takes 37 sounds to lose each unit.
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan♦
2 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Let's say that the value in spins of each $10 is x.
x is equal to 1 (the spin you get for the initial money) plus 35x/37 (350 bucks, 1/37 of the time). From there, it's simple math. Subtract 35x/37 from both sides. 2x/37=1, so 2x=37
thus
on average, your $20 (2x) will net you 37 spins.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let's say that the value in spins of each $10 is x.
x is equal to 1 (the spin you get for the initial money) plus 35x/37 (350 bucks, 1/37 of the time). From there, it's simple math. Subtract 35x/37 from both sides. 2x/37=1, so 2x=37
thus
on average, your $20 (2x) will net you 37 spins.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let's say that the value in spins of each $10 is x.
x is equal to 1 (the spin you get for the initial money) plus 35x/37 (350 bucks, 1/37 of the time). From there, it's simple math. Subtract 35x/37 from both sides. 2x/37=1, so 2x=37
thus
on average, your $20 (2x) will net you 37 spins.
$endgroup$
Let's say that the value in spins of each $10 is x.
x is equal to 1 (the spin you get for the initial money) plus 35x/37 (350 bucks, 1/37 of the time). From there, it's simple math. Subtract 35x/37 from both sides. 2x/37=1, so 2x=37
thus
on average, your $20 (2x) will net you 37 spins.
answered 1 hour ago
Ben BardenBen Barden
26614
26614
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f79851%2fhow-long-will-my-money-last-at-roulette%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
This seems a math problem not a puzzling problem
$endgroup$
– Yout Ried
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@YoutRied Perhaps. Looking at the test points at this meta answer, I think that this question has a "clever or elegant solution" and an "unexpected or counterintuitive result". I'm not sure if this can be said to have an "unexpected problem statement".
$endgroup$
– Tanner Swett
5 hours ago