How long will my money last at roulette?












1












$begingroup$


I'm at the casino, standing next to a roulette table with a $10 minimum bet. I want to stay here as long as possible, so I'm going to repeatedly make the minimum bet until I run out of money.



I'm playing European roulette, and I'm putting my money on 28 every time. This means that with every spin, I have a 1 in 37 chance of winning $350, and a 36 in 37 chance of losing $10.



I only have $20 in my pocket, so I'm almost certainly not going to be here for very long! (This is distinctly not awesome.) But, on the other hand, there is a small chance that I'll get 35 extra spins, so that's got to count for a little bit.



So, how long, on average, is my money going to last me? Three spins? Four?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    This seems a math problem not a puzzling problem
    $endgroup$
    – Yout Ried
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @YoutRied Perhaps. Looking at the test points at this meta answer, I think that this question has a "clever or elegant solution" and an "unexpected or counterintuitive result". I'm not sure if this can be said to have an "unexpected problem statement".
    $endgroup$
    – Tanner Swett
    5 hours ago
















1












$begingroup$


I'm at the casino, standing next to a roulette table with a $10 minimum bet. I want to stay here as long as possible, so I'm going to repeatedly make the minimum bet until I run out of money.



I'm playing European roulette, and I'm putting my money on 28 every time. This means that with every spin, I have a 1 in 37 chance of winning $350, and a 36 in 37 chance of losing $10.



I only have $20 in my pocket, so I'm almost certainly not going to be here for very long! (This is distinctly not awesome.) But, on the other hand, there is a small chance that I'll get 35 extra spins, so that's got to count for a little bit.



So, how long, on average, is my money going to last me? Three spins? Four?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    This seems a math problem not a puzzling problem
    $endgroup$
    – Yout Ried
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @YoutRied Perhaps. Looking at the test points at this meta answer, I think that this question has a "clever or elegant solution" and an "unexpected or counterintuitive result". I'm not sure if this can be said to have an "unexpected problem statement".
    $endgroup$
    – Tanner Swett
    5 hours ago














1












1








1





$begingroup$


I'm at the casino, standing next to a roulette table with a $10 minimum bet. I want to stay here as long as possible, so I'm going to repeatedly make the minimum bet until I run out of money.



I'm playing European roulette, and I'm putting my money on 28 every time. This means that with every spin, I have a 1 in 37 chance of winning $350, and a 36 in 37 chance of losing $10.



I only have $20 in my pocket, so I'm almost certainly not going to be here for very long! (This is distinctly not awesome.) But, on the other hand, there is a small chance that I'll get 35 extra spins, so that's got to count for a little bit.



So, how long, on average, is my money going to last me? Three spins? Four?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




I'm at the casino, standing next to a roulette table with a $10 minimum bet. I want to stay here as long as possible, so I'm going to repeatedly make the minimum bet until I run out of money.



I'm playing European roulette, and I'm putting my money on 28 every time. This means that with every spin, I have a 1 in 37 chance of winning $350, and a 36 in 37 chance of losing $10.



I only have $20 in my pocket, so I'm almost certainly not going to be here for very long! (This is distinctly not awesome.) But, on the other hand, there is a small chance that I'll get 35 extra spins, so that's got to count for a little bit.



So, how long, on average, is my money going to last me? Three spins? Four?







mathematics probability game






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 6 hours ago









Tanner SwettTanner Swett

610411




610411








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    This seems a math problem not a puzzling problem
    $endgroup$
    – Yout Ried
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @YoutRied Perhaps. Looking at the test points at this meta answer, I think that this question has a "clever or elegant solution" and an "unexpected or counterintuitive result". I'm not sure if this can be said to have an "unexpected problem statement".
    $endgroup$
    – Tanner Swett
    5 hours ago














  • 2




    $begingroup$
    This seems a math problem not a puzzling problem
    $endgroup$
    – Yout Ried
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @YoutRied Perhaps. Looking at the test points at this meta answer, I think that this question has a "clever or elegant solution" and an "unexpected or counterintuitive result". I'm not sure if this can be said to have an "unexpected problem statement".
    $endgroup$
    – Tanner Swett
    5 hours ago








2




2




$begingroup$
This seems a math problem not a puzzling problem
$endgroup$
– Yout Ried
5 hours ago




$begingroup$
This seems a math problem not a puzzling problem
$endgroup$
– Yout Ried
5 hours ago












$begingroup$
@YoutRied Perhaps. Looking at the test points at this meta answer, I think that this question has a "clever or elegant solution" and an "unexpected or counterintuitive result". I'm not sure if this can be said to have an "unexpected problem statement".
$endgroup$
– Tanner Swett
5 hours ago




$begingroup$
@YoutRied Perhaps. Looking at the test points at this meta answer, I think that this question has a "clever or elegant solution" and an "unexpected or counterintuitive result". I'm not sure if this can be said to have an "unexpected problem statement".
$endgroup$
– Tanner Swett
5 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















6












$begingroup$

Suppose $t(n)$ is the average number of spins you get if you start with $$10n$. We want $t(2)$. If you start with $n$ ten-dollar bills, put $n-1$ in your pocket and play until you are broke, then take the next $10 out and play until you are broke, and so on: this is exactly equivalent to just starting with $$10n$ and playing until you're broke, so $t(n)=kn$ for some $k$. On the other hand, obviously $t(0)=0$ and for $n>0$ we have $t(n)=1+frac{36}{37}t(n-1)+frac{1}{37}t(n+35)$. Substituting $t(n)=kn$ into the latter equation and solving for $k$ we find




$k=37$ -- i.e., the number of spins you get, on average, is 37 times your initial multiple of the minimum stake. So if you arrive with $$20$ and the minimum stake is $$10$ then on average you get to spin the wheel 74 times.




[EDITED to add:] JonMark Perry's answer suggests another way to proceed after establishing that $t(n)=kn$: once you have that you can




go from "you lose $$frac{10}{37}$ per spin on average" to "it takes 37 spins to lose $$10$ on average". But, for me at least, this takes a little more thought to see it's valid than the more straightforward calculation above.




[Meta: to me this seems just "fun" enough to be a puzzle rather than a mere mathematics problem, but I won't be upset if others disagree and this gets closed for being too mathematics-textbook-problem-y.]






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Certainly an unexpected or unintuitive solution. I would have expected the answer to be much less.
    $endgroup$
    – GentlePurpleRain
    4 hours ago



















0












$begingroup$

Imagine you start with $$370$. You play for $37$ turns and come back with $$360$. You borrow $$10$, and go again for another $37$ turns, and again come back with $$360$, and borrow another $$10$.



You repeat for a total of $37$ big turns, and now you have borrowed as much as you came with, and the bank won't lend you any more money.



So, you survive $37$ big turns with $$370$. $37$ big turns is $1369$ turns, but we only want $frac2{37}$ of this, which is:




74 turns.







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    "Imagine you start with $370. You play for 37 turns and come back with $350." If you play 37 spins, the "expectation" is that you lose $10 36 times and win $350 once, making a net loss of $10, so you'll have $360.
    $endgroup$
    – Tanner Swett
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @TannerSwett; I forgot you get your stake back!
    $endgroup$
    – JonMark Perry
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    It looks to me as if you're assuming that "it takes an average of N turns to lose $10" and "on average you lose $10/N per turn" are equivalent -- the first is what's obvious and the second is what you're using -- but that seems like a thing that needs proving. Or am I missing the point somehow?
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @GarethMcCaughan; 2->1 is obvious, and 1->2 is because of the uniformity of roulette
    $endgroup$
    – JonMark Perry
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Incidentally, if this argument works then it seems to me you don't need the business about "big turns" at all: you lose an average of 1/37 of a unit per spin, "therefore" on average it takes 37 sounds to lose each unit.
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    2 hours ago



















0












$begingroup$

Let's say that the value in spins of each $10 is x.




x is equal to 1 (the spin you get for the initial money) plus 35x/37 (350 bucks, 1/37 of the time). From there, it's simple math. Subtract 35x/37 from both sides. 2x/37=1, so 2x=37




thus




on average, your $20 (2x) will net you 37 spins.







share|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "559"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f79851%2fhow-long-will-my-money-last-at-roulette%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    6












    $begingroup$

    Suppose $t(n)$ is the average number of spins you get if you start with $$10n$. We want $t(2)$. If you start with $n$ ten-dollar bills, put $n-1$ in your pocket and play until you are broke, then take the next $10 out and play until you are broke, and so on: this is exactly equivalent to just starting with $$10n$ and playing until you're broke, so $t(n)=kn$ for some $k$. On the other hand, obviously $t(0)=0$ and for $n>0$ we have $t(n)=1+frac{36}{37}t(n-1)+frac{1}{37}t(n+35)$. Substituting $t(n)=kn$ into the latter equation and solving for $k$ we find




    $k=37$ -- i.e., the number of spins you get, on average, is 37 times your initial multiple of the minimum stake. So if you arrive with $$20$ and the minimum stake is $$10$ then on average you get to spin the wheel 74 times.




    [EDITED to add:] JonMark Perry's answer suggests another way to proceed after establishing that $t(n)=kn$: once you have that you can




    go from "you lose $$frac{10}{37}$ per spin on average" to "it takes 37 spins to lose $$10$ on average". But, for me at least, this takes a little more thought to see it's valid than the more straightforward calculation above.




    [Meta: to me this seems just "fun" enough to be a puzzle rather than a mere mathematics problem, but I won't be upset if others disagree and this gets closed for being too mathematics-textbook-problem-y.]






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Certainly an unexpected or unintuitive solution. I would have expected the answer to be much less.
      $endgroup$
      – GentlePurpleRain
      4 hours ago
















    6












    $begingroup$

    Suppose $t(n)$ is the average number of spins you get if you start with $$10n$. We want $t(2)$. If you start with $n$ ten-dollar bills, put $n-1$ in your pocket and play until you are broke, then take the next $10 out and play until you are broke, and so on: this is exactly equivalent to just starting with $$10n$ and playing until you're broke, so $t(n)=kn$ for some $k$. On the other hand, obviously $t(0)=0$ and for $n>0$ we have $t(n)=1+frac{36}{37}t(n-1)+frac{1}{37}t(n+35)$. Substituting $t(n)=kn$ into the latter equation and solving for $k$ we find




    $k=37$ -- i.e., the number of spins you get, on average, is 37 times your initial multiple of the minimum stake. So if you arrive with $$20$ and the minimum stake is $$10$ then on average you get to spin the wheel 74 times.




    [EDITED to add:] JonMark Perry's answer suggests another way to proceed after establishing that $t(n)=kn$: once you have that you can




    go from "you lose $$frac{10}{37}$ per spin on average" to "it takes 37 spins to lose $$10$ on average". But, for me at least, this takes a little more thought to see it's valid than the more straightforward calculation above.




    [Meta: to me this seems just "fun" enough to be a puzzle rather than a mere mathematics problem, but I won't be upset if others disagree and this gets closed for being too mathematics-textbook-problem-y.]






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Certainly an unexpected or unintuitive solution. I would have expected the answer to be much less.
      $endgroup$
      – GentlePurpleRain
      4 hours ago














    6












    6








    6





    $begingroup$

    Suppose $t(n)$ is the average number of spins you get if you start with $$10n$. We want $t(2)$. If you start with $n$ ten-dollar bills, put $n-1$ in your pocket and play until you are broke, then take the next $10 out and play until you are broke, and so on: this is exactly equivalent to just starting with $$10n$ and playing until you're broke, so $t(n)=kn$ for some $k$. On the other hand, obviously $t(0)=0$ and for $n>0$ we have $t(n)=1+frac{36}{37}t(n-1)+frac{1}{37}t(n+35)$. Substituting $t(n)=kn$ into the latter equation and solving for $k$ we find




    $k=37$ -- i.e., the number of spins you get, on average, is 37 times your initial multiple of the minimum stake. So if you arrive with $$20$ and the minimum stake is $$10$ then on average you get to spin the wheel 74 times.




    [EDITED to add:] JonMark Perry's answer suggests another way to proceed after establishing that $t(n)=kn$: once you have that you can




    go from "you lose $$frac{10}{37}$ per spin on average" to "it takes 37 spins to lose $$10$ on average". But, for me at least, this takes a little more thought to see it's valid than the more straightforward calculation above.




    [Meta: to me this seems just "fun" enough to be a puzzle rather than a mere mathematics problem, but I won't be upset if others disagree and this gets closed for being too mathematics-textbook-problem-y.]






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    Suppose $t(n)$ is the average number of spins you get if you start with $$10n$. We want $t(2)$. If you start with $n$ ten-dollar bills, put $n-1$ in your pocket and play until you are broke, then take the next $10 out and play until you are broke, and so on: this is exactly equivalent to just starting with $$10n$ and playing until you're broke, so $t(n)=kn$ for some $k$. On the other hand, obviously $t(0)=0$ and for $n>0$ we have $t(n)=1+frac{36}{37}t(n-1)+frac{1}{37}t(n+35)$. Substituting $t(n)=kn$ into the latter equation and solving for $k$ we find




    $k=37$ -- i.e., the number of spins you get, on average, is 37 times your initial multiple of the minimum stake. So if you arrive with $$20$ and the minimum stake is $$10$ then on average you get to spin the wheel 74 times.




    [EDITED to add:] JonMark Perry's answer suggests another way to proceed after establishing that $t(n)=kn$: once you have that you can




    go from "you lose $$frac{10}{37}$ per spin on average" to "it takes 37 spins to lose $$10$ on average". But, for me at least, this takes a little more thought to see it's valid than the more straightforward calculation above.




    [Meta: to me this seems just "fun" enough to be a puzzle rather than a mere mathematics problem, but I won't be upset if others disagree and this gets closed for being too mathematics-textbook-problem-y.]







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 2 hours ago

























    answered 5 hours ago









    Gareth McCaughanGareth McCaughan

    63k3162246




    63k3162246












    • $begingroup$
      Certainly an unexpected or unintuitive solution. I would have expected the answer to be much less.
      $endgroup$
      – GentlePurpleRain
      4 hours ago


















    • $begingroup$
      Certainly an unexpected or unintuitive solution. I would have expected the answer to be much less.
      $endgroup$
      – GentlePurpleRain
      4 hours ago
















    $begingroup$
    Certainly an unexpected or unintuitive solution. I would have expected the answer to be much less.
    $endgroup$
    – GentlePurpleRain
    4 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    Certainly an unexpected or unintuitive solution. I would have expected the answer to be much less.
    $endgroup$
    – GentlePurpleRain
    4 hours ago











    0












    $begingroup$

    Imagine you start with $$370$. You play for $37$ turns and come back with $$360$. You borrow $$10$, and go again for another $37$ turns, and again come back with $$360$, and borrow another $$10$.



    You repeat for a total of $37$ big turns, and now you have borrowed as much as you came with, and the bank won't lend you any more money.



    So, you survive $37$ big turns with $$370$. $37$ big turns is $1369$ turns, but we only want $frac2{37}$ of this, which is:




    74 turns.







    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      "Imagine you start with $370. You play for 37 turns and come back with $350." If you play 37 spins, the "expectation" is that you lose $10 36 times and win $350 once, making a net loss of $10, so you'll have $360.
      $endgroup$
      – Tanner Swett
      3 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @TannerSwett; I forgot you get your stake back!
      $endgroup$
      – JonMark Perry
      3 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      It looks to me as if you're assuming that "it takes an average of N turns to lose $10" and "on average you lose $10/N per turn" are equivalent -- the first is what's obvious and the second is what you're using -- but that seems like a thing that needs proving. Or am I missing the point somehow?
      $endgroup$
      – Gareth McCaughan
      3 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @GarethMcCaughan; 2->1 is obvious, and 1->2 is because of the uniformity of roulette
      $endgroup$
      – JonMark Perry
      3 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Incidentally, if this argument works then it seems to me you don't need the business about "big turns" at all: you lose an average of 1/37 of a unit per spin, "therefore" on average it takes 37 sounds to lose each unit.
      $endgroup$
      – Gareth McCaughan
      2 hours ago
















    0












    $begingroup$

    Imagine you start with $$370$. You play for $37$ turns and come back with $$360$. You borrow $$10$, and go again for another $37$ turns, and again come back with $$360$, and borrow another $$10$.



    You repeat for a total of $37$ big turns, and now you have borrowed as much as you came with, and the bank won't lend you any more money.



    So, you survive $37$ big turns with $$370$. $37$ big turns is $1369$ turns, but we only want $frac2{37}$ of this, which is:




    74 turns.







    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      "Imagine you start with $370. You play for 37 turns and come back with $350." If you play 37 spins, the "expectation" is that you lose $10 36 times and win $350 once, making a net loss of $10, so you'll have $360.
      $endgroup$
      – Tanner Swett
      3 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @TannerSwett; I forgot you get your stake back!
      $endgroup$
      – JonMark Perry
      3 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      It looks to me as if you're assuming that "it takes an average of N turns to lose $10" and "on average you lose $10/N per turn" are equivalent -- the first is what's obvious and the second is what you're using -- but that seems like a thing that needs proving. Or am I missing the point somehow?
      $endgroup$
      – Gareth McCaughan
      3 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @GarethMcCaughan; 2->1 is obvious, and 1->2 is because of the uniformity of roulette
      $endgroup$
      – JonMark Perry
      3 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Incidentally, if this argument works then it seems to me you don't need the business about "big turns" at all: you lose an average of 1/37 of a unit per spin, "therefore" on average it takes 37 sounds to lose each unit.
      $endgroup$
      – Gareth McCaughan
      2 hours ago














    0












    0








    0





    $begingroup$

    Imagine you start with $$370$. You play for $37$ turns and come back with $$360$. You borrow $$10$, and go again for another $37$ turns, and again come back with $$360$, and borrow another $$10$.



    You repeat for a total of $37$ big turns, and now you have borrowed as much as you came with, and the bank won't lend you any more money.



    So, you survive $37$ big turns with $$370$. $37$ big turns is $1369$ turns, but we only want $frac2{37}$ of this, which is:




    74 turns.







    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    Imagine you start with $$370$. You play for $37$ turns and come back with $$360$. You borrow $$10$, and go again for another $37$ turns, and again come back with $$360$, and borrow another $$10$.



    You repeat for a total of $37$ big turns, and now you have borrowed as much as you came with, and the bank won't lend you any more money.



    So, you survive $37$ big turns with $$370$. $37$ big turns is $1369$ turns, but we only want $frac2{37}$ of this, which is:




    74 turns.








    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 3 hours ago

























    answered 3 hours ago









    JonMark PerryJonMark Perry

    19.2k63991




    19.2k63991












    • $begingroup$
      "Imagine you start with $370. You play for 37 turns and come back with $350." If you play 37 spins, the "expectation" is that you lose $10 36 times and win $350 once, making a net loss of $10, so you'll have $360.
      $endgroup$
      – Tanner Swett
      3 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @TannerSwett; I forgot you get your stake back!
      $endgroup$
      – JonMark Perry
      3 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      It looks to me as if you're assuming that "it takes an average of N turns to lose $10" and "on average you lose $10/N per turn" are equivalent -- the first is what's obvious and the second is what you're using -- but that seems like a thing that needs proving. Or am I missing the point somehow?
      $endgroup$
      – Gareth McCaughan
      3 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @GarethMcCaughan; 2->1 is obvious, and 1->2 is because of the uniformity of roulette
      $endgroup$
      – JonMark Perry
      3 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Incidentally, if this argument works then it seems to me you don't need the business about "big turns" at all: you lose an average of 1/37 of a unit per spin, "therefore" on average it takes 37 sounds to lose each unit.
      $endgroup$
      – Gareth McCaughan
      2 hours ago


















    • $begingroup$
      "Imagine you start with $370. You play for 37 turns and come back with $350." If you play 37 spins, the "expectation" is that you lose $10 36 times and win $350 once, making a net loss of $10, so you'll have $360.
      $endgroup$
      – Tanner Swett
      3 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @TannerSwett; I forgot you get your stake back!
      $endgroup$
      – JonMark Perry
      3 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      It looks to me as if you're assuming that "it takes an average of N turns to lose $10" and "on average you lose $10/N per turn" are equivalent -- the first is what's obvious and the second is what you're using -- but that seems like a thing that needs proving. Or am I missing the point somehow?
      $endgroup$
      – Gareth McCaughan
      3 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @GarethMcCaughan; 2->1 is obvious, and 1->2 is because of the uniformity of roulette
      $endgroup$
      – JonMark Perry
      3 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Incidentally, if this argument works then it seems to me you don't need the business about "big turns" at all: you lose an average of 1/37 of a unit per spin, "therefore" on average it takes 37 sounds to lose each unit.
      $endgroup$
      – Gareth McCaughan
      2 hours ago
















    $begingroup$
    "Imagine you start with $370. You play for 37 turns and come back with $350." If you play 37 spins, the "expectation" is that you lose $10 36 times and win $350 once, making a net loss of $10, so you'll have $360.
    $endgroup$
    – Tanner Swett
    3 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    "Imagine you start with $370. You play for 37 turns and come back with $350." If you play 37 spins, the "expectation" is that you lose $10 36 times and win $350 once, making a net loss of $10, so you'll have $360.
    $endgroup$
    – Tanner Swett
    3 hours ago












    $begingroup$
    @TannerSwett; I forgot you get your stake back!
    $endgroup$
    – JonMark Perry
    3 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    @TannerSwett; I forgot you get your stake back!
    $endgroup$
    – JonMark Perry
    3 hours ago












    $begingroup$
    It looks to me as if you're assuming that "it takes an average of N turns to lose $10" and "on average you lose $10/N per turn" are equivalent -- the first is what's obvious and the second is what you're using -- but that seems like a thing that needs proving. Or am I missing the point somehow?
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    3 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    It looks to me as if you're assuming that "it takes an average of N turns to lose $10" and "on average you lose $10/N per turn" are equivalent -- the first is what's obvious and the second is what you're using -- but that seems like a thing that needs proving. Or am I missing the point somehow?
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    3 hours ago












    $begingroup$
    @GarethMcCaughan; 2->1 is obvious, and 1->2 is because of the uniformity of roulette
    $endgroup$
    – JonMark Perry
    3 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    @GarethMcCaughan; 2->1 is obvious, and 1->2 is because of the uniformity of roulette
    $endgroup$
    – JonMark Perry
    3 hours ago




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    Incidentally, if this argument works then it seems to me you don't need the business about "big turns" at all: you lose an average of 1/37 of a unit per spin, "therefore" on average it takes 37 sounds to lose each unit.
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    2 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    Incidentally, if this argument works then it seems to me you don't need the business about "big turns" at all: you lose an average of 1/37 of a unit per spin, "therefore" on average it takes 37 sounds to lose each unit.
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    2 hours ago











    0












    $begingroup$

    Let's say that the value in spins of each $10 is x.




    x is equal to 1 (the spin you get for the initial money) plus 35x/37 (350 bucks, 1/37 of the time). From there, it's simple math. Subtract 35x/37 from both sides. 2x/37=1, so 2x=37




    thus




    on average, your $20 (2x) will net you 37 spins.







    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      Let's say that the value in spins of each $10 is x.




      x is equal to 1 (the spin you get for the initial money) plus 35x/37 (350 bucks, 1/37 of the time). From there, it's simple math. Subtract 35x/37 from both sides. 2x/37=1, so 2x=37




      thus




      on average, your $20 (2x) will net you 37 spins.







      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        Let's say that the value in spins of each $10 is x.




        x is equal to 1 (the spin you get for the initial money) plus 35x/37 (350 bucks, 1/37 of the time). From there, it's simple math. Subtract 35x/37 from both sides. 2x/37=1, so 2x=37




        thus




        on average, your $20 (2x) will net you 37 spins.







        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Let's say that the value in spins of each $10 is x.




        x is equal to 1 (the spin you get for the initial money) plus 35x/37 (350 bucks, 1/37 of the time). From there, it's simple math. Subtract 35x/37 from both sides. 2x/37=1, so 2x=37




        thus




        on average, your $20 (2x) will net you 37 spins.








        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 1 hour ago









        Ben BardenBen Barden

        26614




        26614






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f79851%2fhow-long-will-my-money-last-at-roulette%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Михайлов, Христо

            Гороховецкий артиллерийский полигон

            Центральная группа войск