How does density work?











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I recently learned the law of universal gravitation: F = GmM / d². It dictates that all objects should fall at the same acceleration, but how is density explained then, if the (example) a watercontainer with a ball inside denser than water fall at the same acceleration?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




SlayerGames44 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1




    I'm not sure I fully understand your question. Why do you think that objects of different density should accelerate at different rates if they are dropped from the same height?
    – Aaron Stevens
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    @AaronStevens the OP is still thinking in terms of " heavier things fall faster" the ancient mistake which did not think of air resistance.
    – anna v
    1 hour ago






  • 2




    I don't understand the question either. What does density have to do with acceleration during a fall? Why would the fact that all objects fall at the same speed mean that density needs to be "explained"?
    – Allure
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    @Allure I'm thinking about a container of water and a ball inside it that is denser than water. So, if gravity pulls the water and the ball with the same force, how come the ball sink?
    – SlayerGames44
    1 hour ago






  • 2




    your problem is badly formulated in the question.
    – anna v
    1 hour ago















up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I recently learned the law of universal gravitation: F = GmM / d². It dictates that all objects should fall at the same acceleration, but how is density explained then, if the (example) a watercontainer with a ball inside denser than water fall at the same acceleration?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




SlayerGames44 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1




    I'm not sure I fully understand your question. Why do you think that objects of different density should accelerate at different rates if they are dropped from the same height?
    – Aaron Stevens
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    @AaronStevens the OP is still thinking in terms of " heavier things fall faster" the ancient mistake which did not think of air resistance.
    – anna v
    1 hour ago






  • 2




    I don't understand the question either. What does density have to do with acceleration during a fall? Why would the fact that all objects fall at the same speed mean that density needs to be "explained"?
    – Allure
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    @Allure I'm thinking about a container of water and a ball inside it that is denser than water. So, if gravity pulls the water and the ball with the same force, how come the ball sink?
    – SlayerGames44
    1 hour ago






  • 2




    your problem is badly formulated in the question.
    – anna v
    1 hour ago













up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











I recently learned the law of universal gravitation: F = GmM / d². It dictates that all objects should fall at the same acceleration, but how is density explained then, if the (example) a watercontainer with a ball inside denser than water fall at the same acceleration?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




SlayerGames44 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











I recently learned the law of universal gravitation: F = GmM / d². It dictates that all objects should fall at the same acceleration, but how is density explained then, if the (example) a watercontainer with a ball inside denser than water fall at the same acceleration?







newtonian-mechanics newtonian-gravity acceleration density fluid-statics






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




SlayerGames44 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




SlayerGames44 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 5 mins ago









Qmechanic

101k121821137




101k121821137






New contributor




SlayerGames44 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 1 hour ago









SlayerGames44

61




61




New contributor




SlayerGames44 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





SlayerGames44 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






SlayerGames44 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 1




    I'm not sure I fully understand your question. Why do you think that objects of different density should accelerate at different rates if they are dropped from the same height?
    – Aaron Stevens
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    @AaronStevens the OP is still thinking in terms of " heavier things fall faster" the ancient mistake which did not think of air resistance.
    – anna v
    1 hour ago






  • 2




    I don't understand the question either. What does density have to do with acceleration during a fall? Why would the fact that all objects fall at the same speed mean that density needs to be "explained"?
    – Allure
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    @Allure I'm thinking about a container of water and a ball inside it that is denser than water. So, if gravity pulls the water and the ball with the same force, how come the ball sink?
    – SlayerGames44
    1 hour ago






  • 2




    your problem is badly formulated in the question.
    – anna v
    1 hour ago














  • 1




    I'm not sure I fully understand your question. Why do you think that objects of different density should accelerate at different rates if they are dropped from the same height?
    – Aaron Stevens
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    @AaronStevens the OP is still thinking in terms of " heavier things fall faster" the ancient mistake which did not think of air resistance.
    – anna v
    1 hour ago






  • 2




    I don't understand the question either. What does density have to do with acceleration during a fall? Why would the fact that all objects fall at the same speed mean that density needs to be "explained"?
    – Allure
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    @Allure I'm thinking about a container of water and a ball inside it that is denser than water. So, if gravity pulls the water and the ball with the same force, how come the ball sink?
    – SlayerGames44
    1 hour ago






  • 2




    your problem is badly formulated in the question.
    – anna v
    1 hour ago








1




1




I'm not sure I fully understand your question. Why do you think that objects of different density should accelerate at different rates if they are dropped from the same height?
– Aaron Stevens
1 hour ago




I'm not sure I fully understand your question. Why do you think that objects of different density should accelerate at different rates if they are dropped from the same height?
– Aaron Stevens
1 hour ago




1




1




@AaronStevens the OP is still thinking in terms of " heavier things fall faster" the ancient mistake which did not think of air resistance.
– anna v
1 hour ago




@AaronStevens the OP is still thinking in terms of " heavier things fall faster" the ancient mistake which did not think of air resistance.
– anna v
1 hour ago




2




2




I don't understand the question either. What does density have to do with acceleration during a fall? Why would the fact that all objects fall at the same speed mean that density needs to be "explained"?
– Allure
1 hour ago




I don't understand the question either. What does density have to do with acceleration during a fall? Why would the fact that all objects fall at the same speed mean that density needs to be "explained"?
– Allure
1 hour ago




1




1




@Allure I'm thinking about a container of water and a ball inside it that is denser than water. So, if gravity pulls the water and the ball with the same force, how come the ball sink?
– SlayerGames44
1 hour ago




@Allure I'm thinking about a container of water and a ball inside it that is denser than water. So, if gravity pulls the water and the ball with the same force, how come the ball sink?
– SlayerGames44
1 hour ago




2




2




your problem is badly formulated in the question.
– anna v
1 hour ago




your problem is badly formulated in the question.
– anna v
1 hour ago










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
3
down vote













In the situation where you have a ball inside, let's say, a water tank, and the water tank on top of a table, both the water and the ball feel the attraction of gravity. The water can't move down is because it's placed inside a rigid container on top of a table. But the ball is not inside a rigid medium; it is inside water. Therefore, if the gravitational pull is larger than the buoyancy force (which happens if the ball is denser than water, Archimedes' law), there is an acceleration pointing down that makes the ball sink.



If you throw from the top of a building a water tank with a ball inside, the ball wouldn't sink inside the water. Rather, the water and the ball would accelerate equally and not move with respect to each other.






share|cite|improve this answer




























    up vote
    1
    down vote













    I think what you're asking about is the question of buoyant forces upon the ball in the water, and so whether or not that, because while gravity accelerates all objects equally, a more dense ball in water would, under ordinary conditions, "want" more strongly to adhere to the bottom than a less-dense ball would, would this somehow change or cause the two to behave differently in free-fall?



    And the answer to this is no. In free-fall, everything acts as if there were no gravity present, with regard to at least the local environment of the thing itself. This is a crucial insight that was what led Einstein to develop his theory of general relativity.(*) When there is no gravity, there are no buoyant forces. Thus the situations of separated ball-and-liquid pairs, separated balls, separated liquids, two balls of different densities immersed in same liquid, etc. all behave the same way in terms of downward motion. The balls and liquid fall at the same rate. Moreover, since the buoyant and all forces on the liquid in its reference frame are effectively zero, the liquid will try to round itself out - this is part of why that rain drops are roughly spherical (the elongation is due to aerodynamic forces due to the movement through the atmosphere - but if you isolated one drop in a small container with steady atmosphere to maintain pressure so as to remain liquid, it would assume a perfectly spherical shape in free-fall) - while the ball can assume and keep any position within or without the liquid, for the total duration of the fall until, of course, everything strikes the ground.



    (*) In particular, what this tells you is free-fall is an inertial frame of reference in the exact same sense as Newton's first law, and by extension, that gravitational forces are "fictitious" forces like the centrifugal force! And this is a profound insight indeed, and its consequences at once both both wondrous and mind-boggling, and which have still yet to be entirely unraveled, even 100+ years later.






    share|cite|improve this answer




























      up vote
      1
      down vote













      From a comment:




      I'm thinking about a container of water and a ball inside it that is denser than water. So, if gravity pulls the water and the ball with the same force, how come the ball sink?




      You have to realize that in the case of a dense ball in a container of water, both the water and the ball have other forces acting on them than just gravity. The ball has gravity and a buoyant force acting on it. The water has gravity and forces from the sides and bottom of the container acting on it.



      When we say that all objects have the same acceleration due to gravity, this is assuming that gravity is the only force acting on the objects. As soon as other forces are involved, then you can make the accelerations anything you want them to be by picking the forces.



      So, in your example the water is not accelerating because the force of gravity is exactly balanced out by the force from the bottom of the container acting on the water. The dense ball will accelerate down through the water, but with a reduced acceleration due to the buoyant force. This is because the buoyant force is weaker than the weight of the object.






      share|cite|improve this answer




























        up vote
        0
        down vote













        Edit after comments by OP and clarification of question



        A feather and a ball fall at the same rate in vacuum, because there is no air resistance.



        As far as we have discovered by observations and the models fitted to observations, there are four forces in nature.



        Matter as we have studied it is composed out of atoms and molecules that are held together by electromagnetic interactions. Gravitational forces are very weak at the atomic level and do not contribute to the particular densities of particular masses, after they have formed. The density depends on the organization of the electromagnetic interactions between the atoms. Thus some substances are dense, i.e. more atoms per cubic centimeters, and some lighter.



        (this said, gravity collectively organizes matter, as in geological stratifications, and sediments in general, but once formed they are held together by electromagnetic interactions)



        Thus, as gravitational forces always act and masses used in gravitation are posited to be the same masses in F=ma of accelerating objects, the combination of the gravitational force and the electromagnetic interactions of all atoms in any form lead to the observed buoyancy:




        In physics, buoyancy or upthrust, is an upward force exerted by a fluid that opposes the weight of an immersed object. In a column of fluid, pressure increases with depth as a result of the weight of the overlying fluid. Thus the pressure at the bottom of a column of fluid is greater than at the top of the column. Similarly, the pressure at the bottom of an object submerged in a fluid is greater than at the top of the object. The pressure difference results in a net upward force on the object. The magnitude of the force is proportional to the pressure difference, and (as explained by Archimedes' principle) is equivalent to the weight of the fluid that would otherwise occupy the volume of the object, i.e. the displaced fluid.



        For this reason, an object whose average density is greater than that of the fluid in which it is submerged tends to sink. If the object is less dense than the liquid, the force can keep the object afloat. This can occur only in a non-inertial reference frame, which either has a gravitational field or is accelerating due to a force other than gravity defining a "downward" direction.




        (Air is considered a fluid in physics .)



        In the situation of a ball withing a water container , the center of mass of the system will be falling with the gravitational force, and the system would not change during the fall (although waves might start with the initial acceleration in the water, the buoyancy would be the same)






        share|cite|improve this answer























        • I know a feather and a ball fall differently because of air resistance, BUT how does density (and the fact that objects denser than water sink) fit into the model of gravity?
          – SlayerGames44
          1 hour ago










        • For the video, it is the buoyancy of air resistance, for the water it is the water resistance, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buoyancy .It is the collective basically electromagnetic interactions of matter that offer resistance to flow, which is related to mass, inertial mass is equivalent to gravitational mass axiomatically, i.e. observations forced us.
          – anna v
          1 hour ago










        • I have edited. ...
          – anna v
          1 hour ago











        Your Answer





        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
        });
        });
        }, "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "151"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: false,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: null,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });






        SlayerGames44 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f449219%2fhow-does-density-work%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes








        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes








        up vote
        3
        down vote













        In the situation where you have a ball inside, let's say, a water tank, and the water tank on top of a table, both the water and the ball feel the attraction of gravity. The water can't move down is because it's placed inside a rigid container on top of a table. But the ball is not inside a rigid medium; it is inside water. Therefore, if the gravitational pull is larger than the buoyancy force (which happens if the ball is denser than water, Archimedes' law), there is an acceleration pointing down that makes the ball sink.



        If you throw from the top of a building a water tank with a ball inside, the ball wouldn't sink inside the water. Rather, the water and the ball would accelerate equally and not move with respect to each other.






        share|cite|improve this answer

























          up vote
          3
          down vote













          In the situation where you have a ball inside, let's say, a water tank, and the water tank on top of a table, both the water and the ball feel the attraction of gravity. The water can't move down is because it's placed inside a rigid container on top of a table. But the ball is not inside a rigid medium; it is inside water. Therefore, if the gravitational pull is larger than the buoyancy force (which happens if the ball is denser than water, Archimedes' law), there is an acceleration pointing down that makes the ball sink.



          If you throw from the top of a building a water tank with a ball inside, the ball wouldn't sink inside the water. Rather, the water and the ball would accelerate equally and not move with respect to each other.






          share|cite|improve this answer























            up vote
            3
            down vote










            up vote
            3
            down vote









            In the situation where you have a ball inside, let's say, a water tank, and the water tank on top of a table, both the water and the ball feel the attraction of gravity. The water can't move down is because it's placed inside a rigid container on top of a table. But the ball is not inside a rigid medium; it is inside water. Therefore, if the gravitational pull is larger than the buoyancy force (which happens if the ball is denser than water, Archimedes' law), there is an acceleration pointing down that makes the ball sink.



            If you throw from the top of a building a water tank with a ball inside, the ball wouldn't sink inside the water. Rather, the water and the ball would accelerate equally and not move with respect to each other.






            share|cite|improve this answer












            In the situation where you have a ball inside, let's say, a water tank, and the water tank on top of a table, both the water and the ball feel the attraction of gravity. The water can't move down is because it's placed inside a rigid container on top of a table. But the ball is not inside a rigid medium; it is inside water. Therefore, if the gravitational pull is larger than the buoyancy force (which happens if the ball is denser than water, Archimedes' law), there is an acceleration pointing down that makes the ball sink.



            If you throw from the top of a building a water tank with a ball inside, the ball wouldn't sink inside the water. Rather, the water and the ball would accelerate equally and not move with respect to each other.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered 1 hour ago









            anonymous

            436210




            436210






















                up vote
                1
                down vote













                I think what you're asking about is the question of buoyant forces upon the ball in the water, and so whether or not that, because while gravity accelerates all objects equally, a more dense ball in water would, under ordinary conditions, "want" more strongly to adhere to the bottom than a less-dense ball would, would this somehow change or cause the two to behave differently in free-fall?



                And the answer to this is no. In free-fall, everything acts as if there were no gravity present, with regard to at least the local environment of the thing itself. This is a crucial insight that was what led Einstein to develop his theory of general relativity.(*) When there is no gravity, there are no buoyant forces. Thus the situations of separated ball-and-liquid pairs, separated balls, separated liquids, two balls of different densities immersed in same liquid, etc. all behave the same way in terms of downward motion. The balls and liquid fall at the same rate. Moreover, since the buoyant and all forces on the liquid in its reference frame are effectively zero, the liquid will try to round itself out - this is part of why that rain drops are roughly spherical (the elongation is due to aerodynamic forces due to the movement through the atmosphere - but if you isolated one drop in a small container with steady atmosphere to maintain pressure so as to remain liquid, it would assume a perfectly spherical shape in free-fall) - while the ball can assume and keep any position within or without the liquid, for the total duration of the fall until, of course, everything strikes the ground.



                (*) In particular, what this tells you is free-fall is an inertial frame of reference in the exact same sense as Newton's first law, and by extension, that gravitational forces are "fictitious" forces like the centrifugal force! And this is a profound insight indeed, and its consequences at once both both wondrous and mind-boggling, and which have still yet to be entirely unraveled, even 100+ years later.






                share|cite|improve this answer

























                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote













                  I think what you're asking about is the question of buoyant forces upon the ball in the water, and so whether or not that, because while gravity accelerates all objects equally, a more dense ball in water would, under ordinary conditions, "want" more strongly to adhere to the bottom than a less-dense ball would, would this somehow change or cause the two to behave differently in free-fall?



                  And the answer to this is no. In free-fall, everything acts as if there were no gravity present, with regard to at least the local environment of the thing itself. This is a crucial insight that was what led Einstein to develop his theory of general relativity.(*) When there is no gravity, there are no buoyant forces. Thus the situations of separated ball-and-liquid pairs, separated balls, separated liquids, two balls of different densities immersed in same liquid, etc. all behave the same way in terms of downward motion. The balls and liquid fall at the same rate. Moreover, since the buoyant and all forces on the liquid in its reference frame are effectively zero, the liquid will try to round itself out - this is part of why that rain drops are roughly spherical (the elongation is due to aerodynamic forces due to the movement through the atmosphere - but if you isolated one drop in a small container with steady atmosphere to maintain pressure so as to remain liquid, it would assume a perfectly spherical shape in free-fall) - while the ball can assume and keep any position within or without the liquid, for the total duration of the fall until, of course, everything strikes the ground.



                  (*) In particular, what this tells you is free-fall is an inertial frame of reference in the exact same sense as Newton's first law, and by extension, that gravitational forces are "fictitious" forces like the centrifugal force! And this is a profound insight indeed, and its consequences at once both both wondrous and mind-boggling, and which have still yet to be entirely unraveled, even 100+ years later.






                  share|cite|improve this answer























                    up vote
                    1
                    down vote










                    up vote
                    1
                    down vote









                    I think what you're asking about is the question of buoyant forces upon the ball in the water, and so whether or not that, because while gravity accelerates all objects equally, a more dense ball in water would, under ordinary conditions, "want" more strongly to adhere to the bottom than a less-dense ball would, would this somehow change or cause the two to behave differently in free-fall?



                    And the answer to this is no. In free-fall, everything acts as if there were no gravity present, with regard to at least the local environment of the thing itself. This is a crucial insight that was what led Einstein to develop his theory of general relativity.(*) When there is no gravity, there are no buoyant forces. Thus the situations of separated ball-and-liquid pairs, separated balls, separated liquids, two balls of different densities immersed in same liquid, etc. all behave the same way in terms of downward motion. The balls and liquid fall at the same rate. Moreover, since the buoyant and all forces on the liquid in its reference frame are effectively zero, the liquid will try to round itself out - this is part of why that rain drops are roughly spherical (the elongation is due to aerodynamic forces due to the movement through the atmosphere - but if you isolated one drop in a small container with steady atmosphere to maintain pressure so as to remain liquid, it would assume a perfectly spherical shape in free-fall) - while the ball can assume and keep any position within or without the liquid, for the total duration of the fall until, of course, everything strikes the ground.



                    (*) In particular, what this tells you is free-fall is an inertial frame of reference in the exact same sense as Newton's first law, and by extension, that gravitational forces are "fictitious" forces like the centrifugal force! And this is a profound insight indeed, and its consequences at once both both wondrous and mind-boggling, and which have still yet to be entirely unraveled, even 100+ years later.






                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    I think what you're asking about is the question of buoyant forces upon the ball in the water, and so whether or not that, because while gravity accelerates all objects equally, a more dense ball in water would, under ordinary conditions, "want" more strongly to adhere to the bottom than a less-dense ball would, would this somehow change or cause the two to behave differently in free-fall?



                    And the answer to this is no. In free-fall, everything acts as if there were no gravity present, with regard to at least the local environment of the thing itself. This is a crucial insight that was what led Einstein to develop his theory of general relativity.(*) When there is no gravity, there are no buoyant forces. Thus the situations of separated ball-and-liquid pairs, separated balls, separated liquids, two balls of different densities immersed in same liquid, etc. all behave the same way in terms of downward motion. The balls and liquid fall at the same rate. Moreover, since the buoyant and all forces on the liquid in its reference frame are effectively zero, the liquid will try to round itself out - this is part of why that rain drops are roughly spherical (the elongation is due to aerodynamic forces due to the movement through the atmosphere - but if you isolated one drop in a small container with steady atmosphere to maintain pressure so as to remain liquid, it would assume a perfectly spherical shape in free-fall) - while the ball can assume and keep any position within or without the liquid, for the total duration of the fall until, of course, everything strikes the ground.



                    (*) In particular, what this tells you is free-fall is an inertial frame of reference in the exact same sense as Newton's first law, and by extension, that gravitational forces are "fictitious" forces like the centrifugal force! And this is a profound insight indeed, and its consequences at once both both wondrous and mind-boggling, and which have still yet to be entirely unraveled, even 100+ years later.







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered 46 mins ago









                    The_Sympathizer

                    3,579923




                    3,579923






















                        up vote
                        1
                        down vote













                        From a comment:




                        I'm thinking about a container of water and a ball inside it that is denser than water. So, if gravity pulls the water and the ball with the same force, how come the ball sink?




                        You have to realize that in the case of a dense ball in a container of water, both the water and the ball have other forces acting on them than just gravity. The ball has gravity and a buoyant force acting on it. The water has gravity and forces from the sides and bottom of the container acting on it.



                        When we say that all objects have the same acceleration due to gravity, this is assuming that gravity is the only force acting on the objects. As soon as other forces are involved, then you can make the accelerations anything you want them to be by picking the forces.



                        So, in your example the water is not accelerating because the force of gravity is exactly balanced out by the force from the bottom of the container acting on the water. The dense ball will accelerate down through the water, but with a reduced acceleration due to the buoyant force. This is because the buoyant force is weaker than the weight of the object.






                        share|cite|improve this answer

























                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote













                          From a comment:




                          I'm thinking about a container of water and a ball inside it that is denser than water. So, if gravity pulls the water and the ball with the same force, how come the ball sink?




                          You have to realize that in the case of a dense ball in a container of water, both the water and the ball have other forces acting on them than just gravity. The ball has gravity and a buoyant force acting on it. The water has gravity and forces from the sides and bottom of the container acting on it.



                          When we say that all objects have the same acceleration due to gravity, this is assuming that gravity is the only force acting on the objects. As soon as other forces are involved, then you can make the accelerations anything you want them to be by picking the forces.



                          So, in your example the water is not accelerating because the force of gravity is exactly balanced out by the force from the bottom of the container acting on the water. The dense ball will accelerate down through the water, but with a reduced acceleration due to the buoyant force. This is because the buoyant force is weaker than the weight of the object.






                          share|cite|improve this answer























                            up vote
                            1
                            down vote










                            up vote
                            1
                            down vote









                            From a comment:




                            I'm thinking about a container of water and a ball inside it that is denser than water. So, if gravity pulls the water and the ball with the same force, how come the ball sink?




                            You have to realize that in the case of a dense ball in a container of water, both the water and the ball have other forces acting on them than just gravity. The ball has gravity and a buoyant force acting on it. The water has gravity and forces from the sides and bottom of the container acting on it.



                            When we say that all objects have the same acceleration due to gravity, this is assuming that gravity is the only force acting on the objects. As soon as other forces are involved, then you can make the accelerations anything you want them to be by picking the forces.



                            So, in your example the water is not accelerating because the force of gravity is exactly balanced out by the force from the bottom of the container acting on the water. The dense ball will accelerate down through the water, but with a reduced acceleration due to the buoyant force. This is because the buoyant force is weaker than the weight of the object.






                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            From a comment:




                            I'm thinking about a container of water and a ball inside it that is denser than water. So, if gravity pulls the water and the ball with the same force, how come the ball sink?




                            You have to realize that in the case of a dense ball in a container of water, both the water and the ball have other forces acting on them than just gravity. The ball has gravity and a buoyant force acting on it. The water has gravity and forces from the sides and bottom of the container acting on it.



                            When we say that all objects have the same acceleration due to gravity, this is assuming that gravity is the only force acting on the objects. As soon as other forces are involved, then you can make the accelerations anything you want them to be by picking the forces.



                            So, in your example the water is not accelerating because the force of gravity is exactly balanced out by the force from the bottom of the container acting on the water. The dense ball will accelerate down through the water, but with a reduced acceleration due to the buoyant force. This is because the buoyant force is weaker than the weight of the object.







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered 45 mins ago









                            Aaron Stevens

                            8,48931239




                            8,48931239






















                                up vote
                                0
                                down vote













                                Edit after comments by OP and clarification of question



                                A feather and a ball fall at the same rate in vacuum, because there is no air resistance.



                                As far as we have discovered by observations and the models fitted to observations, there are four forces in nature.



                                Matter as we have studied it is composed out of atoms and molecules that are held together by electromagnetic interactions. Gravitational forces are very weak at the atomic level and do not contribute to the particular densities of particular masses, after they have formed. The density depends on the organization of the electromagnetic interactions between the atoms. Thus some substances are dense, i.e. more atoms per cubic centimeters, and some lighter.



                                (this said, gravity collectively organizes matter, as in geological stratifications, and sediments in general, but once formed they are held together by electromagnetic interactions)



                                Thus, as gravitational forces always act and masses used in gravitation are posited to be the same masses in F=ma of accelerating objects, the combination of the gravitational force and the electromagnetic interactions of all atoms in any form lead to the observed buoyancy:




                                In physics, buoyancy or upthrust, is an upward force exerted by a fluid that opposes the weight of an immersed object. In a column of fluid, pressure increases with depth as a result of the weight of the overlying fluid. Thus the pressure at the bottom of a column of fluid is greater than at the top of the column. Similarly, the pressure at the bottom of an object submerged in a fluid is greater than at the top of the object. The pressure difference results in a net upward force on the object. The magnitude of the force is proportional to the pressure difference, and (as explained by Archimedes' principle) is equivalent to the weight of the fluid that would otherwise occupy the volume of the object, i.e. the displaced fluid.



                                For this reason, an object whose average density is greater than that of the fluid in which it is submerged tends to sink. If the object is less dense than the liquid, the force can keep the object afloat. This can occur only in a non-inertial reference frame, which either has a gravitational field or is accelerating due to a force other than gravity defining a "downward" direction.




                                (Air is considered a fluid in physics .)



                                In the situation of a ball withing a water container , the center of mass of the system will be falling with the gravitational force, and the system would not change during the fall (although waves might start with the initial acceleration in the water, the buoyancy would be the same)






                                share|cite|improve this answer























                                • I know a feather and a ball fall differently because of air resistance, BUT how does density (and the fact that objects denser than water sink) fit into the model of gravity?
                                  – SlayerGames44
                                  1 hour ago










                                • For the video, it is the buoyancy of air resistance, for the water it is the water resistance, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buoyancy .It is the collective basically electromagnetic interactions of matter that offer resistance to flow, which is related to mass, inertial mass is equivalent to gravitational mass axiomatically, i.e. observations forced us.
                                  – anna v
                                  1 hour ago










                                • I have edited. ...
                                  – anna v
                                  1 hour ago















                                up vote
                                0
                                down vote













                                Edit after comments by OP and clarification of question



                                A feather and a ball fall at the same rate in vacuum, because there is no air resistance.



                                As far as we have discovered by observations and the models fitted to observations, there are four forces in nature.



                                Matter as we have studied it is composed out of atoms and molecules that are held together by electromagnetic interactions. Gravitational forces are very weak at the atomic level and do not contribute to the particular densities of particular masses, after they have formed. The density depends on the organization of the electromagnetic interactions between the atoms. Thus some substances are dense, i.e. more atoms per cubic centimeters, and some lighter.



                                (this said, gravity collectively organizes matter, as in geological stratifications, and sediments in general, but once formed they are held together by electromagnetic interactions)



                                Thus, as gravitational forces always act and masses used in gravitation are posited to be the same masses in F=ma of accelerating objects, the combination of the gravitational force and the electromagnetic interactions of all atoms in any form lead to the observed buoyancy:




                                In physics, buoyancy or upthrust, is an upward force exerted by a fluid that opposes the weight of an immersed object. In a column of fluid, pressure increases with depth as a result of the weight of the overlying fluid. Thus the pressure at the bottom of a column of fluid is greater than at the top of the column. Similarly, the pressure at the bottom of an object submerged in a fluid is greater than at the top of the object. The pressure difference results in a net upward force on the object. The magnitude of the force is proportional to the pressure difference, and (as explained by Archimedes' principle) is equivalent to the weight of the fluid that would otherwise occupy the volume of the object, i.e. the displaced fluid.



                                For this reason, an object whose average density is greater than that of the fluid in which it is submerged tends to sink. If the object is less dense than the liquid, the force can keep the object afloat. This can occur only in a non-inertial reference frame, which either has a gravitational field or is accelerating due to a force other than gravity defining a "downward" direction.




                                (Air is considered a fluid in physics .)



                                In the situation of a ball withing a water container , the center of mass of the system will be falling with the gravitational force, and the system would not change during the fall (although waves might start with the initial acceleration in the water, the buoyancy would be the same)






                                share|cite|improve this answer























                                • I know a feather and a ball fall differently because of air resistance, BUT how does density (and the fact that objects denser than water sink) fit into the model of gravity?
                                  – SlayerGames44
                                  1 hour ago










                                • For the video, it is the buoyancy of air resistance, for the water it is the water resistance, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buoyancy .It is the collective basically electromagnetic interactions of matter that offer resistance to flow, which is related to mass, inertial mass is equivalent to gravitational mass axiomatically, i.e. observations forced us.
                                  – anna v
                                  1 hour ago










                                • I have edited. ...
                                  – anna v
                                  1 hour ago













                                up vote
                                0
                                down vote










                                up vote
                                0
                                down vote









                                Edit after comments by OP and clarification of question



                                A feather and a ball fall at the same rate in vacuum, because there is no air resistance.



                                As far as we have discovered by observations and the models fitted to observations, there are four forces in nature.



                                Matter as we have studied it is composed out of atoms and molecules that are held together by electromagnetic interactions. Gravitational forces are very weak at the atomic level and do not contribute to the particular densities of particular masses, after they have formed. The density depends on the organization of the electromagnetic interactions between the atoms. Thus some substances are dense, i.e. more atoms per cubic centimeters, and some lighter.



                                (this said, gravity collectively organizes matter, as in geological stratifications, and sediments in general, but once formed they are held together by electromagnetic interactions)



                                Thus, as gravitational forces always act and masses used in gravitation are posited to be the same masses in F=ma of accelerating objects, the combination of the gravitational force and the electromagnetic interactions of all atoms in any form lead to the observed buoyancy:




                                In physics, buoyancy or upthrust, is an upward force exerted by a fluid that opposes the weight of an immersed object. In a column of fluid, pressure increases with depth as a result of the weight of the overlying fluid. Thus the pressure at the bottom of a column of fluid is greater than at the top of the column. Similarly, the pressure at the bottom of an object submerged in a fluid is greater than at the top of the object. The pressure difference results in a net upward force on the object. The magnitude of the force is proportional to the pressure difference, and (as explained by Archimedes' principle) is equivalent to the weight of the fluid that would otherwise occupy the volume of the object, i.e. the displaced fluid.



                                For this reason, an object whose average density is greater than that of the fluid in which it is submerged tends to sink. If the object is less dense than the liquid, the force can keep the object afloat. This can occur only in a non-inertial reference frame, which either has a gravitational field or is accelerating due to a force other than gravity defining a "downward" direction.




                                (Air is considered a fluid in physics .)



                                In the situation of a ball withing a water container , the center of mass of the system will be falling with the gravitational force, and the system would not change during the fall (although waves might start with the initial acceleration in the water, the buoyancy would be the same)






                                share|cite|improve this answer














                                Edit after comments by OP and clarification of question



                                A feather and a ball fall at the same rate in vacuum, because there is no air resistance.



                                As far as we have discovered by observations and the models fitted to observations, there are four forces in nature.



                                Matter as we have studied it is composed out of atoms and molecules that are held together by electromagnetic interactions. Gravitational forces are very weak at the atomic level and do not contribute to the particular densities of particular masses, after they have formed. The density depends on the organization of the electromagnetic interactions between the atoms. Thus some substances are dense, i.e. more atoms per cubic centimeters, and some lighter.



                                (this said, gravity collectively organizes matter, as in geological stratifications, and sediments in general, but once formed they are held together by electromagnetic interactions)



                                Thus, as gravitational forces always act and masses used in gravitation are posited to be the same masses in F=ma of accelerating objects, the combination of the gravitational force and the electromagnetic interactions of all atoms in any form lead to the observed buoyancy:




                                In physics, buoyancy or upthrust, is an upward force exerted by a fluid that opposes the weight of an immersed object. In a column of fluid, pressure increases with depth as a result of the weight of the overlying fluid. Thus the pressure at the bottom of a column of fluid is greater than at the top of the column. Similarly, the pressure at the bottom of an object submerged in a fluid is greater than at the top of the object. The pressure difference results in a net upward force on the object. The magnitude of the force is proportional to the pressure difference, and (as explained by Archimedes' principle) is equivalent to the weight of the fluid that would otherwise occupy the volume of the object, i.e. the displaced fluid.



                                For this reason, an object whose average density is greater than that of the fluid in which it is submerged tends to sink. If the object is less dense than the liquid, the force can keep the object afloat. This can occur only in a non-inertial reference frame, which either has a gravitational field or is accelerating due to a force other than gravity defining a "downward" direction.




                                (Air is considered a fluid in physics .)



                                In the situation of a ball withing a water container , the center of mass of the system will be falling with the gravitational force, and the system would not change during the fall (although waves might start with the initial acceleration in the water, the buoyancy would be the same)







                                share|cite|improve this answer














                                share|cite|improve this answer



                                share|cite|improve this answer








                                edited 41 mins ago

























                                answered 1 hour ago









                                anna v

                                156k7148445




                                156k7148445












                                • I know a feather and a ball fall differently because of air resistance, BUT how does density (and the fact that objects denser than water sink) fit into the model of gravity?
                                  – SlayerGames44
                                  1 hour ago










                                • For the video, it is the buoyancy of air resistance, for the water it is the water resistance, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buoyancy .It is the collective basically electromagnetic interactions of matter that offer resistance to flow, which is related to mass, inertial mass is equivalent to gravitational mass axiomatically, i.e. observations forced us.
                                  – anna v
                                  1 hour ago










                                • I have edited. ...
                                  – anna v
                                  1 hour ago


















                                • I know a feather and a ball fall differently because of air resistance, BUT how does density (and the fact that objects denser than water sink) fit into the model of gravity?
                                  – SlayerGames44
                                  1 hour ago










                                • For the video, it is the buoyancy of air resistance, for the water it is the water resistance, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buoyancy .It is the collective basically electromagnetic interactions of matter that offer resistance to flow, which is related to mass, inertial mass is equivalent to gravitational mass axiomatically, i.e. observations forced us.
                                  – anna v
                                  1 hour ago










                                • I have edited. ...
                                  – anna v
                                  1 hour ago
















                                I know a feather and a ball fall differently because of air resistance, BUT how does density (and the fact that objects denser than water sink) fit into the model of gravity?
                                – SlayerGames44
                                1 hour ago




                                I know a feather and a ball fall differently because of air resistance, BUT how does density (and the fact that objects denser than water sink) fit into the model of gravity?
                                – SlayerGames44
                                1 hour ago












                                For the video, it is the buoyancy of air resistance, for the water it is the water resistance, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buoyancy .It is the collective basically electromagnetic interactions of matter that offer resistance to flow, which is related to mass, inertial mass is equivalent to gravitational mass axiomatically, i.e. observations forced us.
                                – anna v
                                1 hour ago




                                For the video, it is the buoyancy of air resistance, for the water it is the water resistance, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buoyancy .It is the collective basically electromagnetic interactions of matter that offer resistance to flow, which is related to mass, inertial mass is equivalent to gravitational mass axiomatically, i.e. observations forced us.
                                – anna v
                                1 hour ago












                                I have edited. ...
                                – anna v
                                1 hour ago




                                I have edited. ...
                                – anna v
                                1 hour ago










                                SlayerGames44 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                                draft saved

                                draft discarded


















                                SlayerGames44 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                                SlayerGames44 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                                SlayerGames44 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                                Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                                Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f449219%2fhow-does-density-work%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Михайлов, Христо

                                Центральная группа войск

                                Троллейбус